Analysing key changes in the IT landscape based on global, economic and governance factors.
The main drivers of growth in localization of IT services are regulatory requirements (GDPR and similar laws), national interests and sanctions risks.
The dominant technology in this area is Kubernetes solutions with regional clusters based on Rancher, OpenShift, and tools like Crossplane for multi-cloud management. There is also a strong emphasis on compliance pipelines, such as automatic GDPR compliance verification using Open Policy Agent.
An illustrative example of digital transformation in this direction is Netflix, which deployed local CDN nodes within the EU to ensure GDPR compliance.
The primary trend in IT infrastructure for 2025 revolves around multi-cloud solutions (AWS + Azure + GCP + local providers) and Sovereign Cloud platforms, such as Switzerland’s Exoscale, Norway’s SAPA, and France’s now pan-European OVHcloud.
TOOLS |
SUPPORTED CLOUD |
LANGUAGE/ APPROACH |
STATE |
NOTES |
TERRAFORM |
Multicloud (AWS, Azure, GCP, etc.) |
Declarative (HCL) |
Yes |
A leader for multicloud scenarios. Supports multiple providers. |
AWS CLOUD-FORMATION |
AWS Only |
Declarative (YAML/JSON) |
Yes |
Integration with AWS services, but limited outside of AWS. |
AZURE RESOURCE MANAGER (ARM) |
AWS Only |
Declarative (JSON) |
Yes |
Deep integration with Azure, but no multi-cloud. |
GOOGLE CLOUD DEPLOYMENT MANAGER |
GCP only |
Declarative (YAML) |
Yes |
Limited flexibility, suitable for simple scenarios. |
PULUMI |
Multicloud (AWS, Azure, GCP, etc.) |
Imperative (Python, TypeScript, Go, .NET) |
Yes |
Allows the use of programming languages, suitable for complex scripts. |
ANSIBLE |
Multicloud (via modules) |
Imperative (YAML) |
No |
Main focus is configuration management and orchestration. |
CHEF |
Multicloud |
Imperative (Ruby DSL) |
No |
Aging tool, being superseded by Ansible/Terraform, Community is shrinking |
PUPPET |
Multicloud |
Declarative (Puppet DSL) |
No |
Focus on compliance and configuration management. Community is shrinking |
SALTSTACK |
Multicloud |
Imperative (YAML/ Python) |
No |
High speed tasking in large infrastructures. |
OPENTOFU |
Multicloud (Terraform fork) |
Declarative (HCL) |
Yes |
Terraform fork with open license, alterative after HashiCorp license change. |
TOOLS |
SCENAIOUS |
PROS |
MINUSES |
Azure Arc |
Hybrid management + Azure integration |
Deep integration with Azure services |
Microsoft lock-in |
Google Anthos |
Multi-cloud with GCP focus |
Powerful tools for Kubernetes |
Expensive, difficult to migrate |
AWS Outposts |
Local AWS |
Full compatibility with AWS |
Ironclad dependency, high cost |
Rancher |
Independent cluster management |
Flexible, open-source |
No cloud integrations |
OpenShift ACM |
Enterprise-hybrid environments |
Red Hat support, security |
Complexity, cost |
OCM |
Open-source multi-clustering |
Independence, flexibility |
Requires expertise |
VMware Tanzu |
Hybrid VM + Kubernetes |
VMware integration, Ideal for companies with legacy infrastructure on VMware. |
Expensive, niche solution |
Neutral countries (Switzerland, UAE) do not always save from extraterritorial laws. For example, Swiss banks still comply with US sanctions. The real trend is hybrid infrastructure, not relocation.
To the growth of IoT, DevOps is adapting via lightweight Kubernetes distributions (K3s, MicroK8s). Infrastructure as code (IaC) for edge devices (Pulumi, Ansible) and GitOps approach.
The “collapse” thesis is exaggerated, but transformation is inevitable.
Rather, search engines are evolving into hybrid platforms combining traditional search and generative AI.
Public clouds are growing (the market will reach $1.3 trillion by 2025 [3]), but hybrid models are gaining momentum: Large companies (Dropbox, 37signals) are partially reverting to self-hosted because of the long-term savings, but it requires expertise and CapEx. And while Kubernetes as a standard, OpenShift and Rancher make hybrid environments easier to manage, Self-hosted solutions are not a panacea. For 80% of SMEs, public clouds remain more profitable due to scale and lack of upfront costs.
The trend is the Growth of FinOps practices:
The CapEx/OpEX balance depends not only on economics, but also on regulation. For example, GDPR is forcing even startups to invest in local infrastructure. Excessive savings also leads to risks: Facebook incident in 2021 (shutting down servers to save money caused a global outage)
A breakthrough is the emergence of free LLMs: Llama (Meta), Mistral (France) and Falcon (UAE) allow SMEs to build AI products without huge budgets, while Hugging Face and Weights & Biases lower the entry threshold for ML. Likewise, the last year has also seen several breakthroughs in optimizing the training of LLM models.
Impact on DevOps:
Despite the fact that in complex projects (e.g., software development) remote work reduces the speed of solving tasks by 15-20% due to communication lags, 58% of employees note an increase in efficiency on remote work.
The reason is the adaptation curve - productivity drops only in teams without remote work experience and is not due to remote work per se, but to the lack of processes (e.g., asynchronous communication, clear OKRs). Positive example of GitLab - originally a distributed company, retains efficiency.
So full on hybrid work model is the trend at the moment:
Hybrid models are becoming the standard, here are the major trends:
Statistic: 65% of FAANG employees prefer hybrid (2 days in the office / 3 at home).
Management is shrinking in agile environments, but is retained in regulated industries.
Where management is being minimized:
Where management stays:
Reduced investment in training:
The consequences have not been long in coming, the market is flooded with self-taught students with gaps in basic skills (lack of understanding of OSI, OS, scripting).
LLM without a systematic approach:
Generation gap:
The problem is the lack of mentorship. Companies like Red Hat, Microsoft, Google (Google Cloud Skills Boost) keep a balance through mentoring programs and internal courses. But most will have to live with this in 2025.
Mental health is a competitive advantage for recruitment and retention.
Challenges:
Tools:
DevOps practices:
Argumentation:
Addendum:
DevSecOps: Integrate security into CI/CD (e.g. automatic code scanning with Snyk).
NoOps as an abstraction
NoOps is not a simplification, but a high-level abstraction where routine tasks are automated and engineers focus on strategy.
NoOps is not suitable for complex systems where fine tuning of infrastructure is required, but in defense of NoOps - I will say that in places where fine manual (not automated) tuning is required - more often than not the technical level of the team is very much sagging. 70% of startups continue to implement NoOps to save resources.
Examples:
Challenges:
Solution:
Examples:
Trends:
The DevOps industry is on the cusp of radical change:
Recommendations:
The future evolution of IT will depend on the ability to adapt to regionalization while maintaining global interoperability through Open Source and standards.